The Child Advocate
Home
What'sNew
Subjects
Contents
Feedback
Search
·
This disorder falls under the category of Pervasive Developmental
Disorders in which Autistic Disorder, Rett’s Disorder, Childhood
Disintegrative Disorder and PDD NOS fall under.
·
This syndrome was originally described by Hans Asperger in 1944
who provided an account of a number of cases whose clinical features resembled
Kanner’s description of autism but it differed in that speech was less
commonly delayed, motor deficits were common, onset was later, and all the
initial cases were in boys.
·
Patients with AD usually engage in a one-sided conversation with
long-winded, pedantic speech about a favorite/narrow topic. This symptom may not
be easily recognized in childhood but may become more salient later on.
·
This behavior may become peculiar in that it often involves
extraordinary amounts of factual information about very circumscribed topics
(snakes, names of stars, maps, TV guides, or railway schedules)
·
AD individuals are usually described as “loners”, but they
express a great interest in making friendships and meeting people.
·
Chronically frustrated by their repeated failures to engage others
and make friendships, some of these individuals develop symptoms of depression
that may require treatment, including medication.
·
This journal was a case presentation of a patient by the name of
“Robert” who was 11 years and 8 months old and diagnosed with AD. Robert was
interested in and quite knowledgeable about astronomy. His interest was quite
intense and he pursued this interest at any opportunity- it intruded on all
aspects of his life.
·
A drawing was represented as a figure in this article which
depicted his interest in astronomy and his more recent interest in time. He
engaged in a long monologue describing the history of the universe and the
various epochs illustrated in the drawing.
·
The drawing illustrates the history of the universe from the
moment of its creation (12:00 midnight) through geologic time, example- the
appearance of bacteria (6:30 am). It illustrates the patient’s profound
interest and knowledge regarding this topic which tended to be all-encompassing
as well as his less-developed fine motor abilities.
· One question raised in this article was- Is Asperger’s Disorder separate and distinct from high-functioning autism?
· Asperger’s original paper entitled: “Autistic Psychopathy in Childhood” by Hans Asperger in 1944 described 4 separate areas:
1. 1.Impairment in social interaction- such as social isolation and poor eye contact
2. 2.Impairment in communication- such as idiosyncratic/unusual use of speech and problems with conversational speech
3. 3.Restricted/Repetitive Behavior and Interests- such as special interests, abnormal fixations, and “stereotypical” play and movements (rocking, ritualized behaviors)
4.
Intelligence- included all levels from genius to -à
MR
1997- Miller and Ozonoff published a study that analyzed Hans Asperger’s original 4 cases and demonstrated that ALL met criteria for autism and none for Asperger’s D/O
1996- Eisenmajer et al. All 69 children fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for autism
1995- Study by Szatmari- 68 pre-school children with PDD only 1 met criteria for Asperger’s disorder
· This together with failure of some children to meet the DSM-IV social impairment criteria for Asperger’s D/O led authors to believe that it was “virtually impossible” to make a DSM-IV diagnosis of Asperger’s D/O
· Criteria were applied to 157 children with clinical diagnoses of autism or Asperger’s and ALL children met the DSM-IV criteria for autism and none met the criteria for Asperger’s D/O b/c all children had social impairment and restricted/repetitive behavior and interests and all had a DSM-IV communication impairment which then qualified them for a diagnosis of Autistic D/O and not Asperger’s D/O. These findings are consistent with those of 5 other studies and indicates that DSM-IV diagnosis of Asperger’s D/O is unlikely.
· Sample of patients obtained by sending a survey to interested families (known by internet website) with children diagnosed with Asperger’s d/o. The overall response rate was 70%- 411 surveys were analyzed (Ages 4-17 mean age=10.5).
A Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire was utilized and 3 questions were used to measure peer shunning:
1. Invitation to birthday parties- 33%
2. Eating alone at lunch- 11%
3. Picked last or almost last for teams- 31%
Yearly Prevalence rate of peer victimization = 94%
73% of respondent’s children were hit by peers/siblings
75% was bullied
10% were attacked by a gang
15% had non-sexual genital assaults
· Children who were older, male or had a diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome were more likely to be shunned by peers
· Victimization rates may reflect underestimates b/c children from family of lower socioeconomic status were not well represented
· Asperger’s syndrome is conceptualized as a high-functioning variant of autism and is usually associated with marked intellectual impairment
· Methods- This study included 150 child psych patients with Asperger’s syndrome, Autistic D/O and ADHD. All had occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) measured at birth and for 88% of the sample at or after 16 months of age. There were 50 of each type of patient all matched for birth year and sex. There are sex and age normative values for wt. and ht. from birth-à 15 years for Swedish children. Swedish normative OFC values are available only for children aged 0-2 years.
Analysis
· Genuine macrocephalus- OFC surpassed norms by 2 SDs or more and ht and wt were both 1 SD or more UNDER that expected on the basis of OFC
· (genuine macrocephalus would not be an appropriate label for children with large heads proportional to overall body size)
· Relative macrocephalus- OFC surpassed the age and sex norms by 2SDs or more and ht OR wt but NOT BOTH was 1 SD or more UNDER that the expected on the basis of OFC
Results
· All 3 groups (Asperger’s, ADHD, and Autism) had mean OFCs at birth that were larger than normal values
· Asperger’s syndrome group was significantly greater than the autistic group
· After 16 months- all 3 groups had mean OFCs above the age/sex norms.
The Asperger’s syndrome
group mean was significantly greater than the ADHD group
|
|
Asperger’s Syndrome |
Autistic Disorder |
ADHD |
|
Genuine macrocephalus at birth |
22% |
9.5% |
14% |
|
Genuine macrocephalus at 16 mo. |
21% |
9.5% |
6% |
· One other study demonstrated that ADHD and not just autistic spectrum D/O’s were associated with enlarged head size
· One problem with this study was that there was no control group without neuropsychiatric D/O was included in this study
·
The finding that the group with Asperger’s syndrome differed
significantly from the other groups suggests that this group with Asperger’s
does have a high rate of macrocephalus- possibly 2 different types – one
present at birth and 1 that emerges only after some years of development.
1. 1.Mayes, S.D., Calhoun, S.L., and Crites D.L. (2001). Does DSM-IV Asperger’s Disorder Exist? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29:263-271.
2. Gillberg, C. and De Souza, L. (2002). Head Circumference in autism, Asperger syndrome, and ADHD: a comparative study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44: 296-300.
3. 3.Volkmar, F.R., Klin, A., Schultz, R.T., Rubin, E., and Bronen, R. (2000) Asperger’s Disorder (Clinical Case Conference). The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157 (2): 262-267.
4. 4.Little, Liza (2001) Peer Victimization of Children with Asperger Spectrum Disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 40: 995-996.
(Volkmar, F.R. (2000)
Asperger’s Disorder. The American
Journal of Psychiatry, 157 (2): 262-267.)
![]()
Home
What'sNew
Subjects
Contents
Feedback
Search
The Child Advocate Asperger's Review Page.
Copyright © 2003-2011 The Child Advocate All rights reserved.
Revised: January 11, 2011
.